The TikTok saga continues to unfold as the D.C. Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals heard arguments on the constitutionality of the "sale or ban" law, which aims to ban the popular social media platform in the United States. The law, signed by President Joe Biden in April, has been met with skepticism by a three-judge panel, who questioned whether TikTok's current business structure is protected by its free speech rights under the First Amendment.

TikTok's lawyers argued that the platform's algorithms are not controlled by the Chinese government and that the data collected from American users is anonymized and comparable to other Chinese companies. They also pointed out that the government's argument against Chinese influence over TikTok's algorithms is unsupported. However, the government countered that TikTok's source code was created in China and that the platform may continue to be influenced by China.

The judges also questioned whether the U.S. branch of TikTok is protected by First Amendment speech laws while it remains under the ownership of ByteDance. Judge Neomi Rao cited a 1988 case in which the circuit upheld the Justice Department's closure of the Palestine Information Office due to its association with a "designated terrorist organization." TikTok's lawyer, Andrew Pincus, was not familiar with the case.

The proposed ban has been met with overwhelming opposition from TikTok creators and users in the U.S., who argue that it would limit their speech and business activity on the platform. The government, however, claims that it is not targeting the creators, but rather the perceived Chinese influence within the platform.

Will TikTok Survive the Ban: A Battle for Free Speech and National Security?

Actions