Kamala Harris, the Democratic presidential candidate, made a surprise visit to the Teamsters' headquarters in Washington D.C. to seek the powerful union's endorsement. The meeting was behind closed doors, with Harris exiting the building by a side entrance at 1:57 pm ET. This move comes as the Teamsters' leadership and members are still deciding whether to endorse Harris or not. While the union has not yet made an official endorsement, this visit could be the precursor to a potential endorsement.

But, what if this assumption is wrong? What if the Teamsters are not as crucial to Harris's campaign as we think? The article mentions that the union has not endorsed a Republican since 1988, but what about the internal polling that shows a significant number of Teamster members will be voting for Trump?

The article also highlights the union's donations to both the Democratic and Republican National Conventions, which raises questions about the union's allegiances. Are they truly committed to the Democratic party, or are they just hedging their bets in an unpredictable election year?

The article mentions that the Teamsters' national board has yet to offer an endorsement to any candidate, but what about the volunteer-run Teamsters National Black Caucus, United Auto Workers, and the 13-million member AFL-CIO, which have all publicly backed Biden and transferred that support to Harris? Is this a sign of a united front among labor unions, or are there still underlying tensions and divisions?

The article also touches on the union's recent deal with the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers, which was ratified by the Hollywood Basic Crafts with the overwhelming support of their new three-year contracts with the studios. This success could be a sign of a more united and powerful labor movement, but what about the concerns of another "Hot Labor Summer" in Tinseltown?

Will Kamala Harris's Surprise Visit to Teamsters HQ Seal the Deal?

Actions