opinionliberal
Why turning 16 won’t suddenly make social media safe for teens
Asia-PacificSaturday, March 28, 2026
Some experts argue that without years of data we can’t know if these bans help mental health. Jonathan Haidt, whose research inspired Australia’s new law, says five years may be needed to see real change. Yet he also insists the internet itself isn’t the enemy—it’s the way platforms push outrage and distraction to keep people hooked. The ’90s web was chaotic but open; today’s feeds are engineered to manipulate young minds.
The deeper issue is the algorithms. Facebook and Instagram together reach nearly half the world every month. Governments could demand clear public reports on how these systems work, restrict addictive features, and insist on stronger moderation. Instead, many leaders are choosing the simpler route of age checks. That’s like setting a speed limit while leaving the cars capable of 200 km/h on the road.
Critics warn that blanket bans can backfire. Young people might move to smaller, less monitored apps where risks like sextortion and harmful content go unchecked. Privacy could shrink further as companies collect more personal data to prove users are old enough. These aren’t excuses to do nothing; they show why rules must target the real drivers of harm rather than just the age of the user.
Actions
flag content