The United States is facing a significant challenge to its education system. Recent plans to reduce the staff of the Department of Education (DOE) by half, from around 4, 100 to 2, 800, are more than just a budget cut. This move is part of a broader push to weaken federal oversight in education, which could lead to a more fragmented and unequal system.

The DOE was created in 1979 to ensure that all students, regardless of their background, have access to a fair and quality education. It plays a crucial role in enforcing civil rights protections, distributing federal funding to high-need schools, regulating student loans, and holding educational institutions accountable. Without adequate staff, the DOE may struggle to fulfill these responsibilities, leading to greater inequalities in education.

The push to reduce the DOE's role is often framed as a way to respect local norms and reduce bureaucracy. However, this argument overlooks the historical context. Throughout history, the political right has often used states' rights as a tool to erode protections that the federal government has sought to ensure. This was the case with slavery, abortion bans, and now, education. The DOE's functions, such as enforcing civil rights protections and distributing federal funding, are deemed "woke" in an era when anything that seeks to level the playing field is suspect.

The DOE's role in education is unique compared to other countries. In the U. S. , education is primarily a state and local responsibility. The DOE's budget, around $250 billion, is relatively modest compared to other national ministries of education. However, its functions are vital for creating a fairer, more integrated, and more economically mobile society.

Many states lack the resources, expertise, or willingness to enforce civil rights protections and fund education equitably. Without federal oversight, wealthier states and districts may thrive while poorer ones suffer, undermining decades of bipartisan efforts to reduce the education gap and standards nationwide.

The consequences of weakening the DOE could be felt for generations. Education is the backbone of economic growth. Countries that prioritize education, like Finland, Singapore, and South Korea, have strong national-level involvement in education policy and consistently outperform the U. S. in math, science, and literacy rankings. At a time when global competition in technology and innovation is fierce, weakening the DOE means the U. S. risks falling behind in STEM education, workforce development, and research capabilities.

The true question here is whether America aspires to be a strong, unified country or merely a fragmented confederation. If this continues, the consequences would be felt for generations, not just in education, but in every facet of American life. The push to reduce the DOE's role is a direct assault on efforts to achieve a reasonably equitable American education and a unified country.

Why America's Education System Is Under Threat

Actions