Who Should Lead U. S. Intelligence?

William John Pulte is now acting director of national intelligence. He’s never worked in intelligence before. His biggest qualification seems to be helping Trump target political opponents. While critics argue he lacks experience, supporters see him as the perfect loyalist. Pulte’s work at the housing agency included sending criminal referrals after Trump’s foes. Among those targeted: a Federal Reserve governor, a senator, and a former state attorney general. None faced prison. Critics call these cases flimsy attempts to smear paperwork. Yet Pulte’s reputation as a hardline Trump ally earned him nicknames like “Little Trump. ” Current and former intelligence officials reacted strongly to the news. Some laughed, thinking it was a joke. Others feared a weaponized intelligence office. One retired CIA officer said the move looked designed to weaken or dismantle the office entirely. Republican senators also doubted Pulte’s fit for the role. They warned against turning the DNI into a propaganda tool.

Trump often avoids Senate confirmation by appointing acting officials. Past examples include Ric Grenell, who reshaped the office quickly—sometimes controversially. Trump has questioned the DNI’s value since its creation after 9/11. The office was meant to unite intelligence agencies but often adds bureaucracy instead. Reform talk comes from both parties. Democrats don’t rush to defend it either. Pulte will keep his housing job while leading intelligence part-time. His main job might be declassifying documents that push Trump’s favorite theories. That includes claims about rigged elections or hidden conspiracies. Some worry he’ll misuse secrets to settle scores. Others think he’s the perfect enforcer for a president who values loyalty over expertise.

Actions