The vice presidential debate between Kamala Harris and Tim Walz, and Mike Pence against Mark Warner, offered a unique perspective on the 2024 presidential election. Vance's strategy to improve his image by attacking Trump and praising Walz raised questions about its effectiveness in improving his personal ratings.

Vance's approach was designed to make him look more attractive as a potential running mate, but it may not have helped Trump. The debate showed that Vance still struggled to engage with Harris, ignoring the Biden administration on several occasions. Walz, on the other hand, was uneven in his performance, showcasing moments of strength and weakness.

The article highlights the importance of addressing accountability issues, such as Walz's admission of exaggerating his experiences while traveling abroad. The Harris-Walz campaign's reluctance to engage in tough media interviews may have contributed to these issues.

While Trump continues to insist that there should be no further debates, the debate format provides a crucial opportunity for both candidates to make their cases. The article concludes by noting that both vice presidential candidates left positive impressions on voters, with the potential for another debate potentially helping Trump make his closing argument.

VP Debate: Vance's Strategy to Improve Image Raises Questions

Actions