You might think that voting for a winning party makes people happier with democracy than voting for a losing one. This idea is known as the "winner-loser gap. " But is it really true? To find out, researchers looked at data from surveys in three countries – the Netherlands, Norway, and Iceland – just before and after new governments were formed. They found that whether you win or lose in an election, it doesn't actually affect how satisfied you are with democracy. This surprising result suggests that the winner-loser gap might not be as big a deal as we thought.

When a new government takes shape, it's often uncertain who will be in power. This makes it a great time to study how winning or losing an election affects how people feel about democracy. By comparing how people felt just before and just after the election results were clear, the researchers used a method called "regression discontinuity design. " This helps show if there's a real effect of winning or losing on satisfaction with democracy.

The results were quite clear: winning or losing an election didn't make much difference in how people felt about their democracy. This might challenge what we think we know about how elections influence people's views. It's an interesting finding that could change how we understand what makes people happy with their democracy.

Voting Wins and Losses: Does It Really Matter for Democracy Happiness?

Actions