A federal judge has given the green light to the Trump administration's plan to significantly reduce the number of USAID staffers both in the United States and abroad. This decision allows the administration to start the countdown for USAID workers overseas to return to the U. S. within 30 days, all at the government's expense. The judge's ruling came in response to a lawsuit filed by unions representing USAID staff, particularly those at risk of being left stranded overseas. The lawsuit highlighted several issues, including delayed medical evacuations for pregnant staffers and their spouses, cut-off emergency communications for some contractors, and lack of support for staff fleeing political violence in Congo.

The lawsuit also challenges the legality of the administration's dismantling of USAID, arguing that eliminating an agency requires congressional approval. However, the judge ruled that the unions' challenge should be addressed under federal employment laws rather than in district court. The judge, Carl Nichols, noted that the agency is still operational, and the alleged injuries are tied to the staffers' existing employment relationships with USAID.

The Trump administration, along with the Department of Government Efficiency, has been quick to shut down USAID, claiming that its programs do not align with the president's agenda and asserting, without evidence, that its work is wasteful. This case is one of several lawsuits challenging the administration's sudden shutdown of the agency, including the placement of agency leadership on administrative leave. In another lawsuit, a judge ordered the administration to temporarily lift a freeze on funding that had halted USAID programs and operations worldwide.

Judge Nichols, a Trump appointee, initially expressed concern about workers in high-risk areas being left without emergency communications. However, he was reassured by the administration's promise of access to two-way radios for 24-7 communications and a phone app with a "panic button. " The judge also accepted assurances from USAID deputy administrator Pete Marocco that workers abroad would be allowed to stay in their jobs beyond the 30 days if they chose to remain overseas.

Workers are worried about the deep staffing cuts coming to their agency and others, fearing they could be left without jobs, visas, or U. S. protection. Pregnant women, in particular, are concerned about their medical care. The court battle over the government's plan to recall most foreign staffers has highlighted several difficulties, including accusations that the Trump administration is delaying medical evacuations for pregnant staffers and their spouses. The administration claims it is providing all necessary care for staffers as it terminates USAID programs and recalls thousands of workers and their families abroad.

However, American women and their spouses say they have been left with substandard medical care in unstable countries, fearing for their lives. One USAID staffer, whose pregnancy is complicated by high blood pressure, expressed her frustration in a court filing. She said, "Everyone says I need to wait and see what happens" with the Trump administration's decisions. Another case involved a pregnant spouse of a USAID worker who was left hemorrhaging in a foreign hospital bed, awaiting delivery. The intervention of a U. S. senator secured the government's agreement to pay for a medical evacuation, but doctors said the approval came too late for her to safely travel back to the U. S.

The State Department did not respond to requests for comment on workers' allegations that the government was stalling or refusing medical evacuations.

USAID Staffers Face Uncertain Future as Judge Allows Trump Administration's Plan

Actions