Unseen Costs: Trump's Deportation Deals Under Scrutiny
High Costs and Questionable Benefits
The Trump administration's strategy to deport immigrants to third countries has come under fire for its high costs and questionable benefits. Senate Democrats have released a report highlighting the financial burden on American taxpayers, with over $32 million spent on sending around 300 individuals to five countries.
Ineffective Program
The report reveals that the majority of those deported were Venezuelans sent to El Salvador. Many of these individuals have already been returned or are set to return to their home countries, raising questions about the effectiveness of the program.
Notable Case: Jamaican National
One notable case involved a Jamaican national who was first sent to Eswatini at a cost of over $181,000, despite a U.S. court's ruling that he should be returned to Jamaica. Weeks later, he was flown back to Jamaica at an additional cost to the U.S. government. The Jamaican government stated they had no objection to his return, further complicating the issue.
White House Response
The White House has not responded to the report, but they have previously stated that the mass deportation program is a central campaign promise. Critics argue that the policy aims to instill fear among migrants and encourage self-deportation.
Lack of Transparency and Oversight
The report also highlights the lack of transparency and oversight in these deportation agreements. There is no evidence that the State Department is monitoring the use of taxpayer funds, even with countries that have records of corruption and human rights abuses.
Senator Jeanne Shaheen's Concerns
Senator Jeanne Shaheen, the top Democrat on the foreign relations committee, expressed concerns about the troubling practice of deporting individuals to countries where they have no connections, at a great expense to taxpayers.
Future Agreements
The report covers agreements and reported third-country removals through January 2026, but it is expected that the Trump administration will pursue more agreements in the future. The minority committee staff understands that the State Department is pursuing third-country removal agreements with 70 to 80 countries.