When President Trump, known for his unconventional choices, tapped former Congressman Lee Zeldin to lead the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), it raised a few eyebrows. Zeldin, who lost his bid for New York's governorship in 2022, isn't exactly known for his environmental credentials. In fact, he's more recognized for his stances on military strength, U. S. -Israel relations, and immigration. Interestingly, he also opposed the certification of the 2020 election results.

While serving in Congress, Zeldin wasn't on any committees that oversaw environmental policy. His track record, according to the League of Conservation Voters, was quite low, with a lifetime score of just 14%. But Trump believes Zeldin will ensure swift deregulatory decisions that boost American businesses. At the same time, Trump wants to maintain the country's reputation for having the cleanest air and water.

Zeldin, now excited to push Trump's economic agenda, promises to pursue energy dominance and revive jobs in the auto industry. His past advocacy for changing federal waters jurisdiction to allow for striped bass fishing is a glimpse into his views on local control. Environmental groups, however, criticized this, fearing overfishing.

Trump's appointment choice aims to revitalize the EPA's initial mission but raises questions about the alignment with the agency's goals. The position of EPA Administrator requires a balance between economic growth and environmental protection, leaving many to wonder if Zeldin is the right fit.

Around the same time, Stephen Miller, a known immigration hardliner, was named the deputy chief of policy. Miller's role in Trump’s previous administration gives a hint of the expected policy direction.

The Unexpected Environmental Pick

Actions