Activism, in the eyes of many, has taken on a life of its own. The recent sign at Columbia University's "encampment" boldly declared, "Activism is Worship." This declaration raises questions about the true nature of modern-day activism. Has it transcended its original purpose and become a new form of faith? The similarities between this activism and traditional organized religions are striking. Both have a set of dogmas, a liturgy, and even an eschatology. But what are the implications of this similarity?

On one hand, activism has always been a powerful force for social and political change. From the abolitionist movement to the Civil Rights Movement, religion has often played a significant role in fueling these efforts. However, the modern Left's social activism seems to be lacking in essential elements. It has no higher authority, no permanent standard of justice, and no concept of grace and mercy. Instead, it relies on trends and utopian visions.

What if the assumption that activism is a new form of faith is wrong? What might the author have missed? For instance, could it be argued that activism has always been a form of worship, even in its traditional manifestations? Or that the line between activism and religiosity has always been blurred?

Moreover, what are the implications of dismissing traditional faiths in favor of this new, harsh activism? Does it inherently lead to a tyranny of trends and a rejection of the common good? Or can it be harnessed to create a better, more just society?

The Uncanny Resemblance: When Activism Becomes a Harsh, New Faith

Actions