Louisiana's congressional map has been a messy legal battle. A judge said the old map was racist and ordered a new one with more Black-majority districts. But another court said the new map is also illegal. Now, the Supreme Court has to sort out this confusing fight. They might change the rules for how maps are drawn, which could make things even more complicated.

The case is called Louisiana v. Callais and Robinson v. Callais. It's about whether Louisiana had to draw a new map with more Black-majority districts. The Supreme Court might change the law, which could make it harder to stop racist map-drawing in the future.

A judge named Shelly Dick said Louisiana's old map was racist because it only had one Black-majority district, even though Black people make up about a third of the state's population. She said the state had to draw a new map with at least two Black-majority districts.

Louisiana tried to fight this, but they lost. They finally gave up and drew a new map with two Black-majority districts. But then, another court said the new map was also illegal. Now, Louisiana doesn't know which map to use.

The Supreme Court has to decide what to do. They might follow the existing law, which says Louisiana did the right thing by drawing a new map. But they might also change the law, which could make it harder to stop racist map-drawing in the future.

The Supreme Court has to be careful with this case. They might surprise us by changing the law, even though they said they wouldn't in a similar case last year. We'll have to wait and see what they decide.

The Strange Case of Louisiana's Voting Maps

Actions