In the complex web of international politics, the line between individuals' allegiances can often blur. This was the case for Fatah Sharif, a UNRWA employee who was recently killed in an airstrike in Lebanon. Sharif's dual identity as a UNRWA employee and a top Hamas commander has sparked controversy and raised questions about the agency's ability to root out militant ties among its staff.

Before his suspension in March, Sharif had been employed by UNRWA, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East, for many years. His connection to Hamas was not publicly known until allegations emerged, leading the agency to launch an investigation. Sharif's ties to Hamas were kept hidden, even from his colleagues at UNRWA, who were unaware of his involvement with the militant group.

Sharif's case is not an isolated incident. In recent years, UNRWA has faced accusations of being infiltrated by Hamas, with some donor countries suspending their funding in response. The agency's Commissioner-General, Philippe Lazzarini, has acknowledged the allegations and has taken steps to address the issue, including suspending Sharif and launching an investigation into his activities.

However, the situation is complicated by the fact that many UNRWA employees are Palestinian refugees themselves, and some may have ties to Hamas due to their political beliefs or family connections. The agency's ability to root out militant ties among its staff is hindered by the fact that many employees are not open about their affiliations, making it difficult to identify those who may be involved with Hamas.

The killing of Sharif has sparked widespread condemnation, with many calling for greater transparency and accountability within UNRWA. The agency's ability to provide vital services to Palestinian refugees is being put to the test, as it struggles to balance its humanitarian mission with the need to root out militant ties among its staff.

The Split Identity of a UNRWA Employee

Actions