Imagine a country where more than half of all counties rely on government aid for a significant portion of their income. This might sound like a generous safety net, but it also raises questions about self-reliance and the future of our economy.

In the past, politicians like Mitt Romney have pointed out that a large number of voters depend on government assistance. While his comments were controversial, they highlighted a real issue. Today, many young people support expensive social programs without considering the costs.

The more the government spends, the less people expect to pay in taxes. This creates a dangerous cycle. We're transferring nearly $2 trillion to low-income Americans each year, which is similar to the GDP of a mid-sized European country. While this helps many people, it's also creating a permanent underclass.

We can afford this because we're one of the wealthiest nations in the world. But how long can this continue if more and more voters rely on government help? Our tax base is shrinking, and the top 5% of earners pay 66% of federal income taxes.

Progressives often look to Scandinavian countries as examples, but those nations have high taxes for everyone. In the US, we're relying on a small group of high earners to fund our economy. This isn't sustainable in the long run.

Our federal debt is a massive generational tax. Last year, the government spent $6.13 trillion, with more than half going to entitlement programs. The deficit was $1.7 trillion, more than the entire budget in 1993.

Politics has become an arms race of victimhood and class warfare. Both sides need to rethink their strategies and consider the long-term impacts of their policies.

The Risk of Government Reliance

Actions