Imagine a world where going to the hospital or death due to some respiratory viruses wasn't as common --  possibility exists in this given scientific field. Is this scenario close to reality? Well, some experts put it this way: "Can frequent testing stop virus spread? " Turns out mere tests can do a lot against these tiny and damaging invaders.

Consider this, scientific minds have utilized a wide variety of models.  Some models show how testing succeeds in not only the war against viruses, but how to avoid larger scale shutdowns.

Experts claim that timely and frequent turnaround tests work best. The sooner the tests return the results, the great the chance to isolate individuals can be highly effective. This means the virus has fewer chances to spread.

Is there a catch? Yes, this can go badly if many people do not participate -- or if the tests aren't sensitive enough. Public collaboration is key for the success of even the best testing plans.

A lot of work is put into this idea. What's the bottom line?  We do not have to live in fear of  a pandemic. Regular testing can greatly reduce the spread of viruses.

Some tests are even designed to find viruses at very early stages of infection. What does this mean? It means that we could potentially detect viruses in people who don't yet have symptoms. When those results are combined with effectively quick turnaround times, we can isolate and quarantine sick people even faster.

At a deeper level, experts think about virus 'R0' values. That's the basis where scientific conclusions are drawn how contagious a virus is.  What can be problematic is that as R0 value increases, the virus spreads much faster in the midst of people. This makes quick test results even more critical.

Many suggest that the testing plan must be fast. Tests could be done every few days. This could help cut the virus's spread by a large margin. Slow tests may not work. Patients can be tested once the are at risk.  After they are aware that have it then the results are already too late. When it comes to pandemics, time is of the essence.

Add the low adherence rates into the mix and it adds even more problems. But this doesn't mean we only need tests. Add in good sanitation, mask-wearing habits, and physical distancing among other efforts. The virus prevention scheme would become much more robust. "

We, as a society, might depend on testing frequently will significantly improve our collective well-being.

The Power of Frequent Tests

Actions