Imagine a Presidential debate where one candidate is so incensed they lose their cool. This might have been the case when former President Donald Trump clashed with Vice President Kamala Harris.

But was Harris's composure really the key to winning? Or was it Trump's temper that let him down? Here are the key takeaways from the debate, where Harris 'moved the points slightly' according to pundits, and Trump's 'anger' had some campaigners worried.

Harris focused on lowering costs, defending policy shifts, and showing her commitment to the middle class. She didn't shy away from tricky questions and presented a clear call to action.

But what about Trump's 'angry' outbursts? Was he trying to exploit the emotions of an already-stressed electorate, or did he genuinely lose his temper? And should we be concerned about his lack of composure?

But let's not forget Trump's own platform: his promises to revive the US economy and stand up to China. How did he answer Harris's jabs and what were the gaps in his argument?

Should we be worried about the contradictions in his policies or is his rugged individualism all that matters?

The debate raised more questions than answers - What if Trump's anger is just a calculated tactic? What if Harris's composure is just a mask for her own lack of passion? Or maybe the real question is: Can a Presidential candidate's emotions be a decisive factor in the election?

The verdict is still out, but one thing's for sure: this debate won't be forgotten anytime soon.

The Great Debate Sizzle: Trump's Anger Meets Harris's Composure

Actions