The Supreme Court is about to dive into a significant debate that could change how much power federal agencies have. This time, it's about a program run by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that requires companies to pay for telecommunications services in areas where they're not usually available. The question is: Did Congress give the FCC too much authority to decide how much money companies should fork over?

Businesses are keen on this case because they see a chance to limit what regulators can do. The court has a majority of conservative justices who might be sympathetic to their arguments. One key issue is whether Congress overstepped its boundaries by handing over too much power to the FCC. Another question is if the FCC can pass the buck to a private company to set the payment amounts.

The FCC and a group led by a conservative organization called Consumers' Research both asked the Supreme Court to weigh in, thanks to mixed rulings from lower courts. The FCC set up a fund in 1996 to help low-income and rural areas get access to telecommunications services. A private company was created to manage this fund.

A judge in New Orleans called the program a "misbegotten tax" that violates constitutional principles. The Supreme Court has already made some rulings this year that limit what federal agencies can do. This new case could open the door to reviewing other long-standing practices across various fields like banking and the environment.

This whole debate is part of a bigger fight against the power of federal agencies, backed by businesses and conservative politicians. President Trump has also been part of this movement, choosing judges who are against federal bureaucracy. A ruling that limits agency power might make things tricky for Trump's plans to use executive power in his second term.

The Big Debate: How Much Power Can Federal Agencies Have?

Actions