Are some big companies in the streaming world playing fair? That's the question at the heart of a legal battle between Fubo, a smaller streaming service, and media giants Disney, Fox, and Warner Bros. Discovery. At the center of the debate is Venu Sports, a new streaming service backed by these giants. Fubo claims that Venu has an "artificial advantage" because it can distribute the companies' sports content without the need for non-sports channels, which Fubo and other smaller competitors must carry.

Last year, Fubo sued Venu, arguing that it's anti-competitive. Surprisingly, a judge agreed, temporarily blocking Venu's launch. But the media giants aren't giving up. They've appealed the decision, and the case is getting a lot of attention in the industry.

Fubo's argument comes down to fairness. They say that Venu's backers control a large chunk of sports rights in the U. S. , and they've agreed not to make their networks available elsewhere for at least three years. This, Fubo claims, would drive them out of business and hurt other competitors.

The media giants, however, argue that they're just trying to innovate, and they point to a past case where consumers failed to prove that pay-TV operators were acting like monopolies. But Fubo isn't convinced. They believe that even new products can be anti-competitive if they're part of a bigger scheme.

The case is set to go to trial next October, no matter what happens with the appeal. It's a story that's shaping up to be a big deal in the world of streaming.

Streaming Battle: Fubo Claims Sports Venture Gives Giants an Unfair Edge

Actions