Quonset Runway Closure: A Question of Priorities

The Rhode Island Airport Corp. decided to shut down runway 5‑23 at Quonset State Airport, a move many see as politically motivated rather than technically justified.

• Strategic Location
  The runway sits on Narragansett Bay, a key spot for pilots during winter winds. Yet the decision was made without hearing from local aviators or holding an open forum.

• Limited Debate
  During the board meeting, questions had to be sent a day ahead, which restricted real debate.

What Could Have Been Done Instead?

• Shift the Runway
  The airfield has room at its northern end to relocate the runway, keeping it usable for small aircraft.

• Alternative Use of Land
  Utilize land near the North Kingstown Golf Course and close to the Electric Boat plant for parking or submarine storage.

Why Not Use Part of a Golf Course?

• Golfers’ Perspective
  Golfers might question whether all 18 holes are truly essential.

• Economic Impact
  The airport’s closure threatens jobs at Electric Boat but could also open the door for projects like a new shipyard or an incinerator that might benefit from the runway’s space.

Corporate Governance Concerns

• Mission vs. Focus
  The airport corporation’s role is to safeguard all state airports, yet its focus seems skewed toward airlines at T. F. Green International.

• Executive Compensation
  The CEO’s high pay and bonuses tied to adding airlines in Warwick suggest that cost savings from cutting runways may benefit corporate executives more than the community.

• Political Appointments
  Board members are appointed by the governor, not elected, raising concerns about political influence over airport decisions.

If pilots or local stakeholders had a seat at the table, priorities might shift toward keeping general aviation operational.