South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson has jumped into the debate over preferred pronouns in schools, filing a friend-of-the-court brief in a case involving the Olentangy Local School District in Ohio. 

The school district passed a policy requiring staff and students to use a student’s preferred pronouns, even if they conflict with the student’s sex assigned at birth. Students who don’t comply face potential punishment. Wilson argues this policy violates the First Amendment rights of students, claiming they shouldn’t be forced to express messages that contradict their own beliefs.  

The brief argues that schools should be places where diverse viewpoints are respected, not coerced. But how do we balance that with the need to create an inclusive environment for all students? 

A three-judge panel initially sided with the school board, but Wilson, along with attorneys general from 19 other states, is asking the full court to reconsider. This case has sparked a national debate about the role of schools in shaping social norms and the limits of free speech. What are the potential consequences of allowing schools to dictate how students address each other? Could this set a precedent for other types of speech restrictions? 

While the court weighs in, this case highlights the complexities of navigating issues of gender identity, free speech, and inclusivity in educational settings.

Pronouns in Schools: A Battleground for Free Speech?

Actions