The Department of Justice saw a major shakeup in its voting rights unit. All senior managers in the voting section were removed. This move was part of a larger effort to reshape the civil rights division. The changes started soon after a Trump ally took the helm of the division. The new leader sent out new guidelines that hinted at a shift in priorities. The focus seemed to move away from protecting marginalized groups and towards supporting the president's agenda.

The voting section, which enforces laws against voter discrimination, lost its chief and five top managers. They were moved to a different office that handles employee complaints. This section had seven managers at the start of the year, overseeing about 30 attorneys. Two other managers either retired or were moved to different tasks. The remaining managers were reassigned to lower-level duties. This move raised concerns about the future of voting rights enforcement. The justice department's civil rights division has a strong reputation for its work. Much of this reputation comes from the non-political, career staff who handle the day-to-day work.

The department also instructed career employees to drop all active cases without explanation. This break from usual practices has caused alarm. The voting section recently dismissed its last active case. This case challenged how a city in Pennsylvania elects its council members. The changes in the voting section are part of a larger wave of reassignments. Several other components of the division have also seen significant losses in personnel. These moves came just before a deadline for employees to decide whether to accept a deferred resignation offer.

The reassignment of experienced managers to low-level duties seems to be a tactic to lower morale and push lawyers to leave. Many of the division’s lawyers are expected to accept the offer to leave the department. The changes have also raised concerns about future political interference. The justice department’s civil rights division has long had resources and a credibility that private plaintiffs can’t match. The removal of career managers could pave the way for politicized hiring. This could lead to a “partisan and ideological capture” of an agency that is supposed to be non-partisan.

The justice department has dismissed several big cases challenging voting laws and electoral districts. These dismissals have happened without proper meetings or explanations. This approach has been criticized as arbitrary and against the principles of law enforcement. The administration’s approach is significantly different from the way the section was run during the first Trump term. Even though the voting section’s work slowed considerably during Trump’s first term, there was a general respect and collegiality for the career employees.

Power Shifts: How Top Voting Rights Officials Were Sidelined

Actions