You might have heard that free radicals can cause some serious health issues. These tiny troublemakers are linked to cancer, heart problems, brain diseases, lung issues, and even inflammation. Research has shown that when our body is under too much pressure (oxidative stress), these free radicals can do a lot of harm. Clinical trials using anti-oxidants to prevent disease progression have shown some positive results. But, these trials didn’t succeed in making anti-oxidants a reliable treatment option because the antioxidants simply weren't effective enough.

Our bodies are complex machines, and their redox environment (which controls the balance of oxidation and reduction) is continually changing. It’s not as simple as just adding a bunch of antioxidants and expecting everything to get balanced. Free radicals also play different roles at different times and places in our bodies. Depending on how much of them there are and where they are, they can either help or hurt us.

Using general reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavengers can cause problems because they eliminate all types of ROS, even the useful ones. This messes with our body’s normal signaling processes. The failure of antioxidants as effective treatments is because we oversimplify the complex redox environment of our cells, seeing it as a static, non-compartmentalized state.

Instead of just calling it "oxidative stress, " if we can identify the exact type of oxidative stress in specific diseases, we might be able to develop more targeted and effective anti-oxidant therapies. This review explores the idea of redox dynamics, the role and type of oxidative stress in diseases, and current anti-oxidant treatments. Plus, it looks into the possibility of creating new, targeted, and effective antioxidants with drug-like properties.

Oxidative Stress: Can We Really Fix It with Anti-oxidants?

Actions