MIT Takes a Stand: Why They Said No to Federal Funds

MIT Made a Bold Move

MIT turned down federal money. Why? Because the money came with strings attached.

The Trump Administration's Conditions

The Trump administration wanted MIT to agree to certain rules:

• Limit who could use which restrooms
• Cap the number of international students
• Freeze tuition for five years

MIT's President Stands Firm

MIT's president, Sally Kornbluth, wrote a letter to the Department of Education. She stated:

• MIT values free thinking and open competition
• The university believes in merit-based admissions
• They don't discriminate based on financial status

Kornbluth acknowledged that MIT already meets many of the compact's standards. But she drew the line at the core premise:

Scientific funding should be based on merit, not political agendas.

The Department of Education's Response

The Department of Education didn't immediately respond to requests for comment.

Other Universities' Reactions

• Some universities are still reviewing the compact
• The University of Texas seemed receptive
• MIT stood firm, choosing independence over federal funds

The Bigger Picture

This isn't just about MIT. It's about the bigger picture:

• Universities are places of free thought and open debate
• They should make decisions based on what's best for their students and faculty
• Not based on political agendas