Mexico is on the verge of a major judicial overhaul, with judges being elected instead of appointed.  President-elect Claudia Sheinbaum insists it's a pro-democracy move, but outgoing President Andrés Manuel López Obrador has openly stated it's aimed at foreign businesses.

Critics argue this move could lead to judges prioritizing their constituents or even the ruling party over the law.  With elections for 7,000 judges nationwide, could we see drug cartels or other criminal elements trying to influence the outcome?

Sheinbaum, a close ally of López Obrador, is walking a tightrope.  She needs to reassure foreign investors who are already wary of the changes, but also appease her boss and his supporters.

This isn't the first time López Obrador has clashed with foreign companies. He's publicly attacked foreign energy firms building cleaner power plants, accusing them of overcharging and weakening the state-owned utility.  He even tried to pass a law guaranteeing the state-owned company a majority share of the market, but courts blocked it, citing the constitution's prohibition against monopolies.

López Obrador frames this as a battle for Mexican sovereignty, claiming foreign companies act like conquistadors exploiting the country.  But isn't there a risk of harming Mexico's economy by alienating foreign investors who are vital to its growth?

The proposed changes are controversial, with judges, court employees, and students protesting across Mexico.  While the current system has its flaws, is an elected judiciary the answer?  Or could it lead to further instability and corruption?

These are questions Mexico needs to answer carefully as it considers this sweeping reform.

Mexico's Judicial Shakeup: Democracy or Corporate Control?

Actions