Sometimes, things aren't what they seem. Take Chief Justice John Roberts, for example. Many probably thought he was a political puppet after he helped out a certain former president in a high-profile legal case. But hold on a moment! Looks can be deceiving. Let’s dig into what really happened.

Chief Justice Roberts, appointed by President Trump himself, teamed up with Justice Amy Coney Barrett to reject Trump’s attempt to delay his upcoming trial. This sent a strong message: the Supreme Court isn’t just a group of political pawns. Judges can act independently, no matter who appointed them.

The world now has its first president with a criminal record. But before you start thinking the court sided with Trump, remember, the decision wasn't unanimous. There’s more than meets the eye. We know that the court let Trump stay on the ballot, ignoring some important legal questions.

You might think, “Well, that’s Justice Roberts being political. ” But is it? Roberts has spoken out against politicians who trash the judicial system for their own gain. He knows the courts can't function if people think they’re biased. He’s not looking to protect any politician, he’s protecting the judicial system.

The chief justice understands the system’s delicate balance. He sees how threats and violence against judges are on the rise. He knows that judges might hesitate to make tough calls if they’re worried about their safety.

Does all this mean we agree with every decision the court makes? No way! Some rulings have been pretty controversial. But that doesn't change the fact that Roberts is standing up for the independence of the judiciary.

We all have our opinions about court decisions. That’s fine. But let's not forget that calling judges corrupt just because we don’t like their rulings is dangerous. It can make it harder for them to do their jobs.

So, next time you think about Chief Justice Roberts, remember that he’s not just a yes-man. He’s a guardian of the system, doing his part to keep it fair and independent.

Meet Justice Roberts: The Surprising Truth About the Supreme Court’s Chief

Actions