A prominent law firm is standing up to a presidential executive order that targets them. The firm, Perkins Coie, claims that the order is unconstitutional and an attack on their right to represent clients and causes that the administration opposes. The order, signed by President Trump, accuses the firm of dishonest and dangerous activities, including undermining elections and discriminating against its own employees through diversity programs.

The lawsuit, filed in federal court, argues that the order is a direct attack on the Constitution and the justice system. The firm claims that the order is designed to intimidate those who advocate for views that the President disagrees with, whether those views are presented on behalf of paying or pro bono clients. The firm is asking the court to strike down the order and prevent it from being implemented.

The executive order also accuses the firm of a range of questionable actions over the years, including undermining democratic elections and the integrity of U. S. courts and law enforcement. The order specifically mentions the firm's representation of Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign and its role in creating a dossier of unsubstantiated allegations about possible Trump-Russia ties.

The lawsuit refutes these allegations, noting that Trump himself filed a lawsuit in 2022 against the firm, Hillary Clinton, and others, alleging a conspiracy. That case was dismissed by a federal court. The lawsuit also points out that the two attorneys who led the firm's work for the Clinton campaign no longer work for Perkins Coie. One of the lawyers, Michael Sussmann, was charged by a Justice Department special counsel in connection with his work related to the dossier but was found not guilty at trial.

The order also accuses the firm of racial discrimination due to its diversity, equity, and inclusion policies. The lawsuit pushes back on this accusation, stating that the firm is committed to diversity and inclusion but does not discriminate against its attorneys or employees based on race or otherwise. The firm's attorneys argue that Trump's order is unconstitutional on several grounds, including violations of the First, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments.

The Justice Department has not yet responded to the lawsuit. This situation raises important questions about the limits of presidential power and the role of the legal system in protecting the rights of individuals and organizations. It also highlights the ongoing tensions between the executive branch and the legal community.

Law Firm Fights Back Against Presidential Attack

Actions