The jury that cleared Karen Read of murder and manslaughter charges had a lot to say after the verdict. One juror, who chose to stay anonymous, shared her thoughts with the media. She believed that the key evidence, the supposed car collision, never happened. She also pointed out that the police investigation was shoddy, which made it tough for the prosecution to build a strong case.

    The juror didn't want to guess what really happened to John O'Keefe, Read's boyfriend at the time. Her job was to decide based on the evidence presented, not to come up with her own theories. She did, however, notice that O'Keefe's arm injuries looked more like dog bites than anything else. This detail made her doubt the prosecution's story.

    On the night in question, Read and O'Keefe had been out drinking with friends. They ended up at a fellow officer's home in Canton, Massachusetts. Read claimed she dropped O'Keefe off outside the house. But prosecutors argued that she hit him with her car and left him to die. The defense, however, suggested that O'Keefe got into a fight inside the home and was attacked by the homeowners' dog.

    The juror blamed the messy police investigation for the prosecution's struggles. She wondered if it was due to tampering or just poor police work. Either way, she felt that a thorough job could have proved or disproved the case right away. The homeowners, Brian and Nicole Albert, said O'Keefe never entered their home. They found out about his death when Nicole's sister burst into their bedroom, upset and out of breath.

    The jury's decision wasn't quick or easy. There was a moment when the jury had to reconsider their verdict. One or more jurors had second thoughts, but the group respected this and deliberated further. They didn't rush their decision, ensuring that every member was comfortable with the verdict. It wasn't just one piece of evidence that caused doubt, but many pieces that left reasonable doubt in their minds.

    Another juror, Paula Prado, initially thought Read was guilty of manslaughter. But as the trial went on, she changed her mind. She noticed too many unanswered questions and no solid evidence placing Read at the scene, besides dropping O'Keefe off. The Massachusetts State Police acknowledged the challenges of the past three years and promised to improve their practices.

Jury Member Questions Police Work in Karen Read Case

Actions