Avery Johnson's overall rating of 85 in EA Sports College Football 25 has sparked controversy, with many questioning whether it accurately reflects his talent on the field. At first glance, Johnson's stats seem impressive: 153 of 228 pass attempts for 2,768 yards with 29 touchdown passes, along with 98 rushing attempts for 817 yards. He was also named the Kansas Gatorade Player of the Year and participated in the Under Armour All-American Game and the All-American Bowl.

But what about his limited playing time in his college debut? Johnson only participated in the final three series of the season-opening 45–0 victory over Southeast Missouri State, completing three of four pass attempts for 55 yards and running five times for 32 yards and one touchdown. Does this limited exposure impact his overall rating?

Furthermore, the inclusion of players' NIL deals in the rating system raises questions about marketability and off-field success. Johnson inked several deals with companies like Robbins Motor Company, Long McArthur Luxury, 2 Elite Apparel, Wildcat NIL, WTC Fiber, Onward Reserve, and EA Sports. His net worth of approximately $256,000 is primarily driven by his NIL deals. Is his marketability and off-field success a fair reflection of his in-game abilities?

Let's think about this: What if Johnson's performance on the field doesn't quite match his off-field presence? What if his marketability is overinflated, and his rating should be adjusted accordingly? Can we assume that his limited playing time in his college debut doesn't impact his overall rating? These questions beg for a critical examination of Johnson's EA rating.

Is Avery Johnson's EA Rating a Fair Reflection of His Talent?

Actions