In a small town in central Illinois, the conversation about AI was surprisingly honest. Students were asked about their thoughts on an AI-driven future. The answers were a mix of fear and hope. One student believed robots would outperform humans. Another worried about job security. A third student, who had been quiet until then, pointed out that the future depends on human choices, not just technology.

    AI is already changing how we live, work, and learn. It influences decisions in healthcare, education, finance, and justice. However, most people do not understand how these systems work. This lack of transparency can lead to bias and unfair outcomes. For example, some AI systems replicate hiring biases, deny insurance claims unfairly, or make incorrect judgments in the legal system. These issues are not rare; they highlight a bigger problem between technology and public oversight.

    History shows us that new technologies often arrive before the rules to govern them. The Industrial Revolution, the internet, and social media all followed this pattern. Each time, the gap between technology and regulation determined who benefited and who suffered. With AI, the stakes are even higher. It affects the structure of our institutions, the distribution of opportunities, and the trust we have in systems.

    So, what can be done? First, education is key. People need to understand how algorithms work and how they affect their lives. This does not mean everyone needs to become a programmer. It means teaching people to question the systems around them. Programs like Finland's "Elements of AI" and the AI Education Project in the United States are good examples.

    Companies cannot be trusted to regulate themselves. Policymakers need to require transparency in high-impact AI systems. This means explaining what data they use, how they function, and how they are monitored. A public registry of these systems would help researchers and journalists hold them accountable.

    Inclusion is also crucial. The people most affected by AI systems should have a say in how they are developed and used. Organizations like the Algorithmic Justice League show what community-driven innovation can look like. Policymakers can create incentives for responsible AI development and long-term thinking.

    Democratizing AI governance does not slow down innovation. Instead, it prevents technological dead ends. Technologies that distribute decision-making tend to be more adaptive and valuable. However, we still need rules to align technological development with public interest.

    There are already examples of inclusive AI governance. The Global Digital Compact and the Berkman Klein Center are working on participatory structures for sharing best practices and scientific knowledge. Locally, people can join oversight efforts, contact their city council, or engage with organizations that promote citizen engagement in tech governance.

    The students in Illinois were right. The future of AI depends on human choices. It is up to us to ensure that AI advances justly and benefits everyone. It is not just about efficiency but about the broader impact on society.

Is AI Going to Take Over Your Future?

Actions