Imagine a room filled with Senate members poised to grill some of President Trump's nominees.  The three nominees, who have gained attention for their controversial views, are Tulsi Gabbard for the director of national intelligence, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for the head of Health and Human Services and Kash Patel for the director of the FBI. The atmosphere is tense.  Let's talk about who said what.

    First up is Tulsi Gabbard. She's facing tough questions from both Republicans and Democrats about her thoughts on Edward Snowden, and whether or not he's a traitor.  Gabbard's been dodging the question with skill. She dodges again.  Her responses are skillfully evasive.  Here, she's avoiding a simple yes or no.  This leaves many feeling frustrated, and some members anxious about her nomination.

    Senator Michael Bennet, of Colorado, is one of the frustrated members of the Senate.  He is losing his patience.  Gabbard is dodging his questions, too.  Bennet demands a simple answer, but Gabbard keeps repeating that Snowden broke the law.  Bennet is not having any of it.

    Gabbard's making enemies on both sides.  This is a risky game, and the Republicans are not going to trust her easily.

    Hillary Clinton might be nefarious, but at least she's safe from Gabbard. But, there's another nominee that has caused some issues:  Kash Patel, the nominee for director of the FBI.  Patel's hearing has been a rollercoaster, with heated exchanges and fiery questions.  Hassan is on the attack.  Patel's responses are defensive.  Hassan is relentless, questioning his loyalty to the Constitution and his relationships with the QAnon movement.  Patel stands his ground.  Patel openly gives a strong denial to accusations about his views on QAnon, labeling them as "baseless. "  Patel wanders into dangerous territory.  He denies that his list of enemies is an "enemies list. "  Clinton-mustache- "So, it's a long list of names he doesn't like? "  Instead of being called out, Patel shies away from being labeled as an anti-law-enforcement advocate.  He is accused of being pro-Trump, which Patel denies.  Patel is calling out the Democrats, but his defense is weak.  The Democrats don't trust him.  During his closing remarks, Senator Charles Grassley, the Republican chair of the Judiciary Committee, asks Patel about his stance on the January 6 riot. Patel is forced to correct himself.  Grassley is not convinced.  Then, Patel declares he is pro-law enforcement.  Patel knows he's lost the Democrats.

    And finally, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is up for the biggest challenge:  answering questions about his vaccine skepticism.  Kennedy's history of making controversial statements on vaccines is well-documented.  GOP Senator Bill Cassidy, of Louisiana, is leading the attack.  Kennedy's responses are confident. Kennedy tries to refine his stance on vaccines.  The audience is unconvinced.

    Kennedy's past positions on vaccines are a major point of contention.  He is reluctant to disavow his previous statements on vaccines.  Kennedy's reluctance is causing concern.  Cassidy is worried about Kennedy's influence.  Cassidy's concerns are real.  Kennedy's vaccine skepticism is a red flag.  Cassidy isn't the only one with reservations.  Republican Senators Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski are also hesitant.  Collins and Murkowski are looking for assurances that Kennedy won't undermine public health efforts.  Kennedy's hesitance to condemn his past views is a problem, and Cassidy isn't having it.

    The pressure is now on the fence-sitting GOP senators.  They have to decide whether they can support these nominations.  They are the last line of protection from these nominees.  Each nominee is facing a tough road to confirmation, especially those who have been hesitant.  If any Republican votes against Gabbard or Kennedy, their nomination is in danger.  Gabbard and Kennedy have a tougher road ahead.  Their confirmation is not guaranteed.  One Republican senator could be the deciding vote.  Patel, however, is on firmer ground.  He's found a friendly audience among Republicans.

    The Senate is now the focus.  Trump's allies are already mounting a pressure campaign to win over undecided Republicans.  Any senators who oppose these nominees will be targeted.  Trump's allies are determined to push these nominations through, and any senator who gets in their way will face the consequences.  The senators are the game changers.  All eyes are on the senators who will decide the fate of these controversial nominees

Fireworks Erupt as Trump's Nominees Face Tough Questions

Actions