For the past decade, China has been making waves in the scientific community with its significant rise in Science Citation Index (SCI) publications. Taking a closer look at data from the Web of Science's Science Citation Index Expanded (2010-2019), China has indeed taken the front seat, surpassing the United States as the top contributor of SCI publications since 2018. Though impressive, the impact of these publications is still catching up to those of other major scientific contributors. Additionally, a noteworthy aspect is the concentration of these publications in a select few journals. With these findings, the review calls for a reevaluation of China's research assessment processes to better align with the growing scientific prowess.

China's ascension in the SCI rankings is a milestone worth celebrating. Yet, the impact metric shows there's still ground to cover to match the influence of other leading nations. This discrepancy invites a deeper inspection into the quality and reach of China's scientific output. The clustering of publications in certain journals also raises questions about diversity and breadth in research dissemination.

Transforming China's research evaluation system is not just about acknowledging the quantity of publications but also ensuring their quality and impact are optimized. This involves fostering an environment where scientists feel encouraged to venture beyond popular journals and into more niche yet significant areas of research.

By critically examining the present state and future directions, this piece aspires to contribute valuable insights to the ongoing conversation about shaping China's scientific landscape. The journey forward hinges on strategic improvements that will ensure China's SCI publications not only lead in numbers but also in scientific impact and influence.

Exploring China's Scientific Breakthroughs: From Numbers to Changes Ahead

Actions