It's been a while since the lawsuit between Division I college athletes and the NCAA started. Sedona Prince from Texas Christian University and Grant House from Arizona State University kicked things off in 2020. They wanted Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) rights and for the NCAA to remove restrictions on revenue sharing.

Fast forward to May 23, 2024, the NCAA tried to settle things by offering $2. 75 billion. But hold on, because the athletes and their attorneys have some ambitious demands.

Judge Claudia Wilken initially blocked the settlement in September. She wasn't happy with boosters potentially paying athletes for vague "valid business purposes. " However, a slight tweak to the clause got her approval a month later.

Now, the lawyers representing three groups of athletes have some big plans. Dan Wetzel, Pat Forde, and Ross Dellenger discussed this on Yahoo! Sports. Forde shared, "The attorneys want 20% of the $2. 8 billion settlement, plus 1% of the total annual revenue. " That’s over $560 million upfront and hundreds of millions more annually. Dellenger compared this to a "multi-level marketing scheme. "

According to Forde, the attorneys also want a slice of the future compensation fund, adding up to a whopping $725 million. But let's remember, these lawyers took a risk and did a lot of work to convince the NCAA and athletes to settle.

Let's not forget the other legal battles the NCAA faces, like Diego Pavia's case. The Vanderbilt quarterback sued due to eligibility standards, and Judge Will Campbell helped him extend his time in college football.

College Athletes vs. NCAA: A Settlement Saga

Actions