The Supreme Court has decided to keep things as they are. They've chosen not to revisit a 25-year-old decision that supports laws keeping protesters away from abortion clinic entrances. This means that laws in places like Carbondale, Illinois, and Englewood, New Jersey, stay in effect. These laws create a safe space around clinics, keeping protesters at a distance.

The court's decision is a blow to those who oppose abortion. They were hoping the court would rule that these laws violate their right to free speech. But the court, despite having a conservative majority, didn't bite. Two conservative justices, Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, did want to take up the Illinois case. Thomas even wrote that the court hasn't used the 2000 ruling much lately, but lower courts still follow it.

The last time the court dealt with this issue was in 2014. They struck down a Massachusetts law, saying it was too broad. But they didn't overturn the 2000 precedent. Since then, the court has overturned Roe v. Wade, the 1973 ruling that legalized abortion nationwide. This has energized the anti-abortion movement, and protesters have started targeting clinics in liberal states near conservative ones where abortion is banned or restricted.

Carbondale is one of those places. Three abortion clinics have opened there since Roe was overturned. The city passed a law in 2023 to keep protesters away from clinics. The law says protesters can't get within eight feet of anyone inside a 100-foot perimeter of a clinic's entrance. An anti-abortion group challenged this, but a federal judge and an appeals court both ruled against them.

The Englewood law is similar. It was enacted in 2014 after disturbances outside a clinic. The law keeps anyone from standing within eight feet of the entrance, except for passersby, employees, and patients. An anti-abortion protester challenged this law, but she lost in the appeals court.

The buffer zone dispute is just one of many abortion-related cases the court has dealt with since Roe was overturned. Earlier this year, the court rejected an attempt to restrict access to the abortion pill mifepristone and sidestepped a ruling on whether a strict abortion ban in Idaho conflicts with federal law.

Clinics vs. Protesters: The Buffer Zone Battle

Actions