The United Nations Climate Change Conference, known as COP29, was supposed to be a big deal for climate finance. With nearly 50, 000 people from 200 countries, including a first-time appearance by the Taliban, gathering in Azerbaijan, the goal was clear: to secure vital funds for the fight against climate change. But the outcome was far from perfect.

Instead of major breakthroughs, the conference was marked by disagreements. A draft deal suggested $250 billion annually by 2035 from rich countries to poorer ones, which is far less than the $1 trillion a year that developing nations were hoping for by the end of the decade. This disparity highlights a deep divide in how much wealthy nations are willing or able to contribute.

A significant shadow loomed over COP29: the anticipated return of the United States to the Paris Agreement under an incoming president. Additionally, low attendance from leaders of wealthy countries overshadowed the event.

Climate experts are growing worried. The World Meteorological Organization warns that 2024 is set to be the hottest year on record, making climate action more urgent than ever. Some think a fresh approach is needed, with some even suggesting the current U. N. climate talks framework is outdated.

Smaller nations, which bear the brunt of climate change, face enormous risks. For instance, Pacific Island nations are threatened by rising sea levels. But geopolitical tension and domestic struggles made some countries reluctant to fully commit to COP29.

Decisions about climate finance are crucial, but they often involve tough compromises. As Ruth Townend from Chatham House observed, "We can choose to be proactive now, when it's cheaper and easier. Or we can wait and deal with the consequences later, which will be tougher and cost much more. "

Climate Cash Controversy: COP29's Frustrating Finance Focus

Actions