Churches and Politics: A Legal Showdown
The Johnson Amendment Under Scrutiny
A major legal dispute is unfolding that could reshape how churches engage in politics. A coalition of religious organizations has launched a lawsuit against the government, seeking to alter a 1954 rule known as the Johnson Amendment. This rule prohibits churches from endorsing political candidates.
The November 2025 Hearing
In November 2025, a court hearing took place to consider a potential settlement. The proposed settlement would permit churches to endorse candidates, and the IRS agreed to this change. However, not everyone supports this shift.
Opposition and Concerns
Some groups oppose the settlement, fearing it could bring politics into religious institutions. They worry about the impact on elections and the erosion of trust in religious organizations.
Arguments from Both Sides
- Proponents of the Change:
- Argue the rule limits free speech.
- Believe churches should have the right to discuss candidates.
- Opponents of the Change:
- Insist churches should remain neutral.
- Fear political pressure on churches.
- Concerned about unregulated political donations from churches.
The IRS's Perspective
The IRS compares church political discussions to family debates, but critics disagree strongly. They believe this could lead to undisclosed political funding, as churches do not have to disclose their financial activities.
Nonprofits' Stance
Many nonprofits oppose the change, arguing it could undermine trust in churches. They believe churches should remain nonpartisan to preserve public confidence.
The Outcome
The hearing concluded without a final decision. All parties can continue to present their arguments. The judge will decide later, and the case could reshape the role of churches in politics and influence public perception of religion in elections.
