The battle over who will chair Chicago's powerful Zoning Committee has turned into a major political showdown.

On one side, Mayor Brandon Johnson is pushing for progressive firebrand Ald. Byron Sigcho-Lopez to lead the committee. On the other, business interests and influential unions are backing an alternative candidate, Ald. Felix Cardona, claiming they have the votes to win.

This fight goes beyond personalities. It's a clash between competing visions for Chicago's future: Will the city prioritize affordable housing and development, or preserve single-family neighborhoods? The stakes couldn't be higher as the city grapples with an urgent housing shortage and affordability crisis.

Sigcho-Lopez has compared his opponents to the racially-motivated opposition that plagued Mayor Harold Washington in the 1980s. But this isn't 40 years ago, and today's concerns stem more from worries about Chicago's business climate than personal animus. Aldermen like Marty Quinn fear liberalized zoning rules would allow outside investors to buy up small homes for rental units, changing neighborhood character.

While we support building more housing stock, including accessory dwelling units, there must be room for common sense and compromise. Larger concerns are at work too - the political standing of the mayor and the need for business input in policymaking.

Johnson has pursued a hard-left agenda that isn't winning public support. Just like mayors, aldermen have to be accountable to voters. Giving the benefit of the doubt to an unpopular mayor becomes a political risk not worth taking. Propping up Johnson simply for expediency isn't appropriate either.

So is this Zoning Committee battle worth waging? We think so for a few reasons:1) Businesspeople who provide most of Chicago's jobs deserve a real seat at the negotiating table, especially when the mayor pays little heed to their practical critiques. Backing Cardona and winning his confirmation would send that message.

2) Cardona promises to be a fair arbiter between development interests, NIMBYs, and housing advocates - something Sigcho-Lopez likely can't claim or even attempt. 3) If Cardona prevails, it should not be seen as a victory for NIMBYism over meeting the need for more housing. All of Chicago's neighborhoods should work toward solving the shortage within their own contexts.

Presuming Cardona does win, we'd like to see him and Mayor Johnson convene a housing summit where all stakeholders meet and hash out principles for how to increase Chicago's housing stock - with clear goals and policy parameters that give residents real say in their future but don't accept an affordability-crushing status quo.

Ultimately, Chicago needs leaders who can bridge divides, find common ground solutions, and put the city's interests first. This Zoning Committee fight is a test of whether our elected officials are up to that challenge in service of all Chicago of all Chicagoans.

Chicago's Housing Crisis: A Battle Over Zoning and Power

Actions