Elon Musk's ambitious plan to slash government spending has caught the attention of President Trump, who enthusiastically backed the idea of returning some of those savings to taxpayers. The proposal suggests that if Musk's target of $2 trillion in cuts is met by next year, about one-fifth of those funds could be sent to taxpayers in the form of checks, potentially around $5, 000 per household.

But hold your horses. Budget experts are skeptical about achieving such massive savings. The federal government’s annual spending is around $6. 8 trillion, and cutting nearly one-third of that seems like a tall order. Plus, using these savings to send out checks could potentially fuel inflation, according to some economists. The White House, however, dismisses this concern.

The idea originated from James Fishback, who runs an investment firm and promoted it on social media. Musk responded positively, and there have been behind-the-scenes talks with White House officials. Musk claims that his Department of Government Efficiency has already saved $55 billion, but these claims haven't been independently verified. Fishback suggests having the Congressional Budget Office confirm the savings.

If the savings reach $500 billion by July 2026, Fishback proposes checks of $1, 250 instead of $5, 000. He believes this would motivate Americans to report wasteful government spending. However, the checks would only go to the roughly 79 million households that pay income taxes, leaving out about 40% of Americans who don't.

Economists and budget experts are doubtful about the effectiveness of focusing on "waste, fraud, and abuse" to significantly reduce government spending. Previous attempts to eliminate waste haven't made much of a dent in the deficit. The Trump administration's move to fire tens of thousands of government workers, for example, isn't likely to produce big savings because only a small portion of federal spending goes to employee salaries. The bulk of the money is tied up in federal benefits and taxes, which aren't within Musk's purview.

John DiIulio Jr. , a political scientist, noted that eliminating the entire federal civilian workforce wouldn't reduce the national debt by much. Government contractors and nonprofits that receive government funds employ three times as many people as federal employees. Additionally, savings can't be achieved without Congress passing laws to reduce appropriations.

The idea of sending out more government checks raises concerns about inflation. Some economists argue that since the money would have been spent by the government anyway, having consumers spend it instead wouldn't boost inflation. However, others warn that with the unemployment rate much lower than in 2021, businesses might struggle to meet the increased demand, potentially pushing up prices.

Elaine Kamarck, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, dismisses the idea as "ridiculous, " stating that there's no substantial money to be returned to taxpayers. She worked on cutting government waste in the Clinton administration and believes the proposal is more talk than action.

Can Elon Musk's Spending Cuts Really Put Money in Your Pocket?

Actions