Campaign Money Questions Stir Debate in Maryland

Maryland Lawmakers Scrutinize Delegate Gary Simmons’ Campaign Spending

The debate over how a new state delegate spent his campaign money has sparked fresh concerns among Maryland lawmakers. The issue began when an investigative review found that the delegate, Gary Simmons, used almost all of his raised funds during a period when no election was held. Only about 14 % of the reported spending could be linked to campaign activities, leaving many questions unanswered.

Lawmakers in Anne Arundel County are now asking whether these expenses fit the rules that allow campaign money for political work but forbid personal use. Simmons’ own filings list a variety of costs—such as meals and other expenses recorded while the General Assembly met in Annapolis. Normally, legislators receive a daily allowance that covers many of these items.

The review also highlighted two medical copayments billed to the campaign, a move that raised eyebrows. Several members of the county’s House and Senate delegation expressed worry about whether the spending complied with state law. Representative Brian Chisholm said some listed expenses did not look like legitimate campaign costs and noted he would see how the situation develops.

Senator Shaneka Henson was the only legislator to reply directly. She praised Simmons as a dedicated public servant and offered help in navigating campaign finance rules. Henson also respected his opponent, describing him as a veteran who serves the community well.

Election officials remind that every campaign finance report is eventually reviewed. Jared DeMarinis, the state board’s administrator, explained that while no case has yet been formally investigated, any questionable spending could be referred to prosecutors. The state prosecutor’s office stated it would only comment if charges were filed.

Attempts to get Simmons to clarify his expenses, including a GoFundMe post by his daughter about college costs, were largely ignored. Simmons declined to answer further questions and the campaign treasurer did not respond.

This situation highlights how careful lawmakers must be when mixing public duties with personal finances, especially during non‑election periods.