A court in Texas has fixed a June trial date for Boeing's legal battle with the U. S. government. This case revolves around accusations that Boeing misled regulators about the 737 Max jetliner before two deadly crashes. These incidents occurred in 2018 and 2019, resulting in the loss of 346 lives.

The judge, Reed O’Connor, did not reveal the reasons behind setting this trial date. Lawyers from both Boeing and the Justice Department have been in discussions to renegotiate a plea deal that was initially set for July 2024. This deal would have seen Boeing admitting to a single felony charge. However, the judge rejected this deal in December. The judge's concern was that the Justice Department's diversity, inclusion, and equity policies might influence the selection of a monitor to oversee Boeing's compliance with the proposed sentence.

Since then, the judge has extended the deadline for both parties to report their plans multiple times. The most recent extension gave them until April 11 to find a resolution. However, the judge revoked this extension with the recent order, setting a timeline for the trial, which is scheduled for June 23 in Fort Worth.

The rejected deal would have allowed Boeing to avoid a criminal trial by admitting to conspiring to defraud regulators. This fraud involved approving minimal pilot training requirements for the 737 Max. The judge did not object to the proposed sentence, which included a fine, investments in safety programs, and outside oversight. Instead, the judge was concerned about the process for selecting a monitor to oversee Boeing's actions.

The judge's concerns were rooted in the idea that the selection process should prioritize competency over diversity and inclusion efforts. This stance aligns with a 2021 executive order aimed at ending diversity programs across the federal government. The outcome of legal challenges to this order could impact the judge's concerns.

The Justice Department's leadership has also changed since the case began. This shift occurred after the government determined that Boeing had violated a 2021 agreement, which had protected it from criminal prosecution. This determination came after a door panel incident on an Alaska Airlines 737 Max in January 2024, which raised concerns about Boeing's manufacturing quality and safety.

Boeing's lawyers have indicated that if the plea deal is rejected, they would challenge the Justice Department's findings. The judge's December decision supported Boeing's position by questioning what the company did to violate the 2021 deal.

Boeing's Legal Hurdles: A June Showdown Looms

Actions