businessliberal
Binance Battles Back: A Legal Storm Over Crypto Compliance
United States, USAThursday, March 12, 2026
Binance has filed a lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal, asserting that the paper’s story about the exchange’s handling of $1.7 billion in illicit transfers is false and damaging. The lawsuit follows a WSJ investigation that claimed Binance quietly shut down its own probe into the money and let compliance staff who flagged it go. The company says those employees were fired for policy violations, not because of their investigations.
Key Points:
- Binance argues the WSJ report omitted crucial facts.
- The exchange maintains it never closed its investigation; staff were let go for breaches of data‑protection rules, not whistleblowing.
- Binance claims the Journal’s piece was written to boost clicks and ignored corrections sent by the company.
Context of the Legal Battle
- U.S. Government Probes: Fresh investigations from the Justice and Treasury Departments.
- Congressional Inquiry: Led by Senator Richard Blumenthal, who cited the WSJ story and other media coverage, demanding explanations for how Binance let suspicious activity go unchecked and why compliance workers were terminated.
- 2023 Settlement: Binance admitted to violating anti‑money‑laundering and sanctions laws, paid a $4.3 billion fine, and had its founder plead guilty to related charges.
Binance’s Claims
- The exchange has tightened compliance since the settlement but fears WSJ allegations could spark more investigations and harm its reputation.
- Binance seeks damages and an order declaring the WSJ’s report defamatory, alleging actual malice.
- If successful, Binance hopes to halt further baseless inquiries.
Current Status
- The Wall Street Journal has not responded to a request for comment.
- A Dow Jones lawyer stated no correction was needed.
- Regulators are unlikely to pause their investigations, and Blumenthal remains skeptical of Binance’s claims.
- The senator is pushing for more records to determine whether Binance has used its influence to avoid accountability, especially after the controversial pardon of its founder by former President Trump.
Actions
flag content