The Federal Reserve is thinking about making it easier for big banks to hold onto certain types of investments. This change could free up around $223 billion for some of the largest financial institutions in the country.

The rule in question, known as the enhanced supplementary leverage ratio, was put in place after the 2008 financial crisis. It was designed to make sure banks had enough capital on hand to weather any future storms. But now, the Fed thinks it might be time for a change.

Banks have been saying for years that this rule is too strict. They argue that it limits their ability to operate and invest in safer assets, like U. S. Treasury bonds. The Fed seems to agree, at least partly. They say that the rule has become too restrictive as banks have built up their reserves.

If the new rule passes, it would lower the amount of capital that big banks need to hold. This could make it easier for them to invest in things like Treasurys, which are seen as low-risk. But not everyone is on board with this plan.

Some Fed officials are worried that easing the rules could lead to problems down the line. They think banks might use the extra capital to pay out dividends or engage in riskier activities, rather than investing in safer assets. They also wonder if the change will really help during times of market stress.

The Fed is set to vote on the new rule soon. It's a big decision that could have major implications for the banking industry and the economy as a whole. It's important to think critically about these changes and consider the potential consequences.

Big Banks Get a Break: Fed Considers Easing Rules

Actions